However, the proposal’s income eligibility requirements are drawing scrutiny, with recent analyses suggesting that a significant portion of the population would be excluded. Under the current guidelines floated by the administration, only taxpayers earning less than approximately $100,000 per year would qualify for the $2,000 payout. According to the most recent data, about 42% of U.S. households earn above this threshold and therefore would not be eligible for the stimulus check if the income cap remains in place.

Critics argue that the high exclusion rate underscores broader challenges with the plan. Many middle-income families, especially those in high-cost urban areas or with dual earners, find their household incomes just above the cutoff, effectively shutting them out of potential relief. Opponents also point out that the tariff revenue touted to fund the checks may be insufficient to cover the cost without expanding the federal deficit, and that the details on implementation, including exact eligibility rules and timelines, remain unsettled pending legislative action.

Supporters contend that targeting payments toward lower- and middle-income earners focuses the benefit where it’s most needed and avoids giving windfalls to wealthier households. But with no formal legislation passed yet and key questions still unanswered, it remains uncertain when—or if—the $2,000 stimulus checks will be distributed. As the debate continues, the policy highlights the ongoing tension between targeted economic support and broad-based financial relief in U.S. fiscal policy discussions.