Police confirmed that the call to Savannah was placed as part of protocol when a potential live signal appears after a prolonged period of silence. Investigators reportedly cross-checked the alert against carrier records and recentsuch as recent activity windows to rule out false positives. Search coordinators have been notified, and relevant units were placed on standby while analysts work to triangulate the signal’s origin. Authorities declined to disclose precise coordinates, citing operational security, and reiterated that the investigation remains active and fluid.

What has intensified attention is the timing. The signal surfaced after days of stalled leads, following a series of evidence reviews and interviews that failed to produce a clear direction. Detectives are now reconstructing the minutes surrounding the detection—testing whether the alert aligns with previously identified movement corridors, transportation routes, or areas flagged in earlier searches. While officials stress restraint, the call to Savannah underscores the seriousness with which the alert is being treated.

Investigators are also examining whether the signal could have been triggered intentionally or inadvertently. Possibilities under review include a device powering on after environmental exposure, brief network reconnection, or third-party interaction. Analysts caution that each scenario carries different implications and none should be inferred without corroboration. The priority, police say, is to stabilize the data, confirm authenticity, and deploy resources proportionately.