Despite unified GOP support for most of the budget’s provisions, internal divisions emerged over its fiscal impact. Senators like Rand Paul voiced strong objections to the $5 trillion debt ceiling increase, warning of unsustainable deficit growth. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill could expand the deficit by up to $5.8 trillion over the next decade, sparking unease among fiscally conservative House Republicans. This tension highlights a broader ideological rift within the party between pro-growth spending and deficit hawks, setting the stage for potential clashes during final negotiations.

The budget framework sets the groundwork for Republicans to push through key legislative priorities without Democratic support. By shielding the bill from a filibuster, the GOP can advance tax cuts and border security funding—cornerstones of Trump’s agenda—despite Democratic resistance. However, the reconciliation process also limits the scope of the legislation, excluding policy changes that don’t directly impact federal spending or revenue. This constraint has led to frustration among some conservatives who hoped for broader reforms, such as entitlement restructuring or deeper spending cuts.

As the bill moves to the House, Republican leaders face pressure to reconcile competing demands within their own party. While Senate Republicans touted the budget as a win for economic growth and national security, House conservatives remain wary of its long-term fiscal consequences. The debate underscores the challenges of governing with a slim majority, where even slight defections could derail the legislation. With Democrats united in opposition, the GOP’s ability to navigate these internal divisions will determine whether Trump’s priorities can become law—or if fiscal concerns will force a scaled-back compromise.